Thursday, December 7, 2017

The Publishing Cycle


I signed a contract this week that includes provision for a new international edition of Janet Frame's novel Faces in the Water to be published next year, to be distributed in New Zealand as well. That will be good news for teachers and academics and Frame fans in general in New Zealand, as there is not currently a local edition of Faces in print here (there is a current Australian and also a UK edition).

Here in New Zealand we have recently come to the end of the publishing cycle of 'The Janet Frame Collection', a series in which all of the eleven novels that Janet Frame published in her lifetime were brought back into print after her death in 2004. Some of the volumes were double editions, for instance Faces in the Water was coupled with The Edge of the Alphabet.


Not long after those Random House NZ editions began going out of print, I started receiving complaints about the unavailability of certain Janet Frame titles for the purpose of educational reading lists. I couldn't help getting the impression that certain academics, who seemed to have studiously ignored the New Zealand reissues in favour of cheaper overseas editions, seemed to perversely only want to set a particular edition as a text immediately after it was no longer available.

Cue Doors refrain, "you only love her as she's walking out the door..."

The process of negotiating new editions can be long and complicated but I'm happy to report that pretty soon there will be a fresh supply in New Zealand of seven of Janet Frame's most important titles: her three volumes of autobiography in the omnibus edition An Angel at My Table, three of her most significant novels: Faces in the Water, Living in the Maniototo, and Towards Another Summer, and The Daylight and the Dust: Selected Stories. These will all be supplied in the excellent Virago Modern Classic editions.







There are already current Text Classic editions of Janet Frame's first novel Owls Do Cry and her last published one In the Memorial Room, available in Australia and New Zealand.



 Considering the current publishing climate this is actually an astonishing feat to have this many titles available (nine) that were written by a literary author. So I do hope that these affordable quality paperback editions are supported by the New Zealand public and educational institutions, because that will make it more likely that publishers will be encouraged to add other Frame titles to their lists.

 

Addressing The Neglect of Janet Frame's Poetry


Introduction by Pamela Gordon


(written for Parleranno le tempeste, the Italian translation of a selection of Janet Frame’s poems, translated by Francesca Benocci and Eleonora Bello, published by Gabriele Cappelli, 2017)

 



‘They think I’m going to be a schoolteacher, but I’m going to be a poet’ wrote eminent New Zealand author Janet Frame in her adolescent diary. And this book of her selected poems in Italian translation resting in your hands now, shows that she achieved her goal. It might not seem in this day and age that the ambition to become a poet would be an audacious one, but the odds were stacked against Janet Frame. Born in 1924 in the provincial city of Dunedin, Frame grew up in the Great Depression in a financially stressed working class family for whom even the profession of teacher represented a distant pinnacle of success. In such an era the most a woman could hope for by way of literary achievement might be in the form of a hobby subsidised by the income of her middle-class husband. But on the maternal side of Frame’s family there was a history of faded gentility: the 19th Century migration of her forebears from the ‘Mother Country’ of England to the British colony had not entirely wiped out a memory of cultured ancestors (a doctor, a clergyman, an Oxford don). Frame’s mother Lottie was herself a prolific writer of verse who published her optimistic and charming rhymes in as many magazines and newspapers as would accept them. She also sold her verse from door to door and had dreams of earning a name as a songwriter. Mrs Frame recited favourite poems by Longfellow and other renowned poets in front of her children with a fervour that was infectious. As a child Lottie had met the young Katherine Mansfield who later became New Zealand’s first great writer. Lottie had worked as a domestic servant in the home of Mansfield’s grandmother where Mansfield and her family came for summer holidays. In relating the story of her tenuous but exciting brush with literary fame, Mrs Frame was, perhaps unconsciously, presenting her daughter with a model to aspire to.

            The young Janet Frame was an exceptional and outspoken student who excelled at academic endeavours and also garnered prizes for her poems and essays. Her schoolgirl poems were frequently published in newspapers and broadcast on children’s radio programmes. She was, therefore, an obvious candidate to be sent to teacher training college regardless of her secret desire to devote her life to writing. She qualified as a teacher with no trouble but by late September 1945, during her first year of teaching, her urge to be spending her time writing was overpowering. The educational authorities refused to release her from her obligations until the end of that year, so eventually Frame just walked out of the classroom. “It was the most wonderful moment of my life,” she said later in an interview. From then on her goal was unshakeable. The following year she completed her first book The Lagoon and Other Stories while working as a nurse-aid in a rest home. The stories were accepted immediately for publication by a publisher who unfortunately let the manuscript sit on his desk for five years before printing it. When the volume of stories was finally released in 1952 it won New Zealand’s most prestigious literary prize and from then on Janet Frame’s standing as a brilliant and original prose writer was assured. After completing her first novel Owls Do Cry Frame travelled to Europe in 1956 where she acquired British and American publishers and went on to forge an international reputation for her novels and stories. When she returned to her homeland at the age of 39 she was feted as a world famous novelist.

            Frame continued her stellar career, publishing steadily, travelling widely, winning prizes and holding fellowships around the globe. Among the many other honours she earned, in 1986 she was made an honorary foreign member of the American Academy of Arts and Letters. The citation described her work as 'a mighty exploration of human consciousness and its context in the natural world'. In 1993 Janet Frame was also awarded the Italian Premi Brancati Prize. In spite of her fame she preferred to enjoy a private existence with her family and friends. She did not court publicity and the resulting vacuum allowed gossip and speculation to grow. Frustrated by the often patronising and sometimes bizarre rumours about the relationship of her life to her work, in the 1980s she released a three volume autobiography in an attempt to ‘set the record straight’. The highly acclaimed trilogy now known as An Angel at My Table was a world-wide bestseller and was hailed as ‘one of the greatest autobiographies’ of the 20th century.

            In 1990 An Angel at My Table was adapted for the screen by Jane Campion and the story of Janet Frame’s early life (her autobiography covered only the first half of her life) attracted an even wider international audience than her celebrated books of prose had commanded. In New Zealand Frame became a beloved icon even for those who would never read the literary fiction that had made her a celebrity in the first place. Her books, which had been translated into several European languages since the early 1960s (Dutch, French, German, Italian and Spanish) were translated into many more languages.

            But where was the poetry? What had happened to the poet? One answer is that Frame’s poetry was ‘hidden in plain sight’ in her prose works, as academic Gina Mercer points out:

 ‘One of the most fixed and impassable borders in literature is that between poetry and prose, yet Janet Frame repeatedly traverses this border, writing poetic prose and including whole chapters of poetry in her fictional explorations.’

As well as the poems scattered throughout her novels, some of Frame’s short stories could be defined as ‘prose poems’ as was recognised by Bill Manhire when he included her story ‘A Note on the Russian War’ from The Lagoon and Other Stories in his 2005 anthology 121 New Zealand Poems. Possibly this kind of focus on the poetic nature of Frame’s prose helped to overshadow the fact that Frame was always producing poems as well. She did occasionally publish individual poems in magazines, but compared to the reputation she was gaining as a novelist, these sporadic publications appear to have been overlooked. Whenever Frame spoke in public, which she did far more than uninformed commentaries on her life might suggest, she almost always recited several of her own poems, to the delight of her audiences.

            Although Janet Frame published only one volume of poems in her lifetime it was substantial, containing 170 poems. The Pocket Mirror, first published in New York in 1967, went on to win the New Zealand Award for Literary Achievement when it was published in her homeland in 1968. The Pocket Mirror was published in multiple editions and reprints, selling tens of thousands of copies which made it a bestseller by New Zealand standards. It is notable that permissions have been issued for well over one hundred of the Pocket Mirror poems. For fifty years its wide range of eminently quotable poems encompassing numerous styles and touching on a broad range of topics has been extensively mined for anthologies, for quotations, and for musical and other adaptations.

            Notwithstanding this commercial success Frame never published another poetry book. Why not? I believe the reasons are complex and that there is no one answer. The many factors include her own need to make a living which meant indulging the desire of her agents and publishers for the more saleable prose work. I experienced this pressure myself as Frame’s literary executor in possession of her unpublished poetry and prose manuscripts. I had to be steadfast in my resolve to see the posthumous poetry volume The Goose Bath published first, as I had been urged to do by my aunt. She had also been reluctant to expose herself to too much scrutiny or even adulation while she was alive, leading her to envisage posthumous publishing as part of her career as it had been for some of the poets she revered, for instance Emily Dickinson. When I tried to encourage her to publish her volume of poetry before her death, so that she might receive the due appreciation for it, she said to me ‘I don’t need anybody to tell me my work is good. Do it after I’m dead.’ It also has to be suggested that male envy is one of the reasons for the attempted suppression of Frame’s vocation as a poet. She emerged at the height of the influence of the so-called ‘mid-century misogynists’ and New Zealand had more than its share of sexist gatekeepers eager to dish out excoriating critiques of anyone who wasn’t a member of the old boy’s club. Several Frame scholars have identified patriarchal disapproval as a factor hampering Frame’s professional trajectory but that explanation has yet to become accepted in the mainstream narratives about Frame.

            Frame’s own diffidence about her poetry is often mentioned as a first reason for her self-censorship but I believe this is over-emphasised. She was, like most New Zealanders of her generation, self-effacing. She could be self-deprecating concerning her writing, her cooking and her various handcraft hobbies. But she was very good at all these. Frame came from a culture where humility was expected but not taken too seriously. “This old thing!” in the New Zealand idiom is a code for a beautifully homemade garment for which the wearer and the maker (one and the same) might appear to deflect admiration but is in context understood as an invitation for praise.

            As it turned out, The Goose Bath was an instant bestseller and it also scooped the prize for the best New Zealand poetry book of 2006. Frame’s poetry volumes reached well beyond the usual readership for poetry. Despite the popularity of her poetry and the fact of Frame’s inclusion in every major New Zealand poetry anthology in the late 20th Century, her status as a poet in her own right has been downplayed in New Zealand poetry circles. For instance a 2014 entry on New Zealand poetry written for the official government online Te Ara Encyclopedia omitted to mention Frame as one of the nation’s prominent poets. When challenged about this, historian Jock Phillips replied that Janet Frame was considered by the author of the article, John Newton, and by the entire Te Ara editorial team to be ‘not of huge influence or significance as a poet (as distinct from a novelist)’ and therefore did not rate mention in the article. The facts do not support their judgement. Frame’s two highly regarded poetry volumes were both prize-winners and bestsellers. The large corpus of poems appearing within her novels, when added to her many other published but uncollected poems, plus the hundreds in her two poetry collections, yield a sum total of published poems to rival the oeuvre of most well known poets who pursue their careers the conventional way by releasing a series of slim volumes and, dare I say it, drinking with the ‘in’ crowd. Over the years Frame read her work in public, was recorded for poetry archives, sent political poems as letters to the editor, circulated memorial poems for reading at the funerals of friends and colleagues, and she continued to supply individual poems for publication in books and magazines until the year before her death in 2004.

             Ten years after Frame’s death doctoral student Iolanda Cozzone noted that Janet Frame’s poetry had been ‘completely neglected by the Italian and international translation market.’ At that time there had been no volumes of Frame’s poetry translated into any language although many individual poems had been translated into languages such as Czech, French, German, Japanese, Portuguese, Russian, Spanish etc. for anthologies and blogs. In her thesis ‘Perspectives on the Translation of Janet Frame’s Verse into Italian’ (2014) Cozzone linked the early biographical fallacies and myth-driven perspectives of Frame’s work to what she identified in 2014 as ‘the current lack of interest in Frame’s poetry’:

‘Perhaps partly due to this tendency to approach her and her work in an uninformed way, critics and scholars have denied Frame her role of poet.’

            Luckily, the story does not end there. Cozzone was not the only one to identify and address the neglect of Frame’s poetry in translation. At the same time as Frame was being discounted as a poet by certain New Zealand literary bureaucrats, several translations of her selected poetry were in preparation elsewhere. This Italian edition Parleranno le Tempeste is the third selected poems in translation to appear in three years. Hungrig Bland Orden was published in 2015 in Sweden, followed by Huesos de Jilguero in Mexican Spanish the same year.

            We must be grateful to the translators and publishers who value the poetic imagination of Janet Frame and who make the effort to render her unique voice, her keen insights and observations, her empathy and wisdom, her fluent use of words and rhythms, her puns and allusions, her startling metaphors, her humour and mischief, into a new language for the delight of new readers. Enjoy!

Pamela Gordon
Janet Frame Literary Trust
Dunedin, New Zealand
8 March 2017

The book Janet Frame wrote in Ibiza

THE MIJO TREE - AFTERWORD



Janet Frame arrived on the Spanish island of Ibiza in November 1956 at the age of thirty-two. She was relishing a sense of freedom in having recently escaped from the stifling environment of her native New Zealand. Her fears about her fate should she stay in her homeland were real enough: she had spent the previous decade being defined by and at times forcibly detained because of the misdiagnosis of schizophrenia that had become attached to her in her twenty-second year.
In 1952 a fortuitously timed literary prize for her first book of short stories had convinced authorities not to carry out a scheduled lobotomy; until then her authorly ambitions had been regarded as delusional by some nursing staff, and her poetic language had been recorded in her medical notes as evidence of hallucination.

Her writing had saved her, but it also continued to endanger her. In that narrow-minded provincial society it seemed that Janet Frame would always be pathologised as ‘odd’.The New Zealand literary gatekeepers of the day had, at least, accepted Frame as a brilliant writer and had encouraged her, but she continued to stand out as unusual. She was a deliberate literary experimenter too far ahead of her time to fit in with their largely nationalist agenda. Her ‘genius’ was admired but her pioneering style was thought by some to be naïve and uncontrolled, and even her key advocates Frank Sargeson and Charles Brasch disapproved of her taboo-breaking subject matter, interpreting it and much else about her as a symptom of her supposed mental disturbance.
Frame, highly educated but from a working-class background, was conflicted by her failure to fit in with the mostly middle-class intelligentsia. She felt miserable at her lack of social experience due to her time spent in institutions, but then again it was in her make-up to resist arbitrary norms and fashions. Her appearance alone made her seem quite peculiar – even in a supposedly 'bohemian' setting – with her untameable red hair and her stubborn refusal to wear the girdles and brassieres that young women were expected to wear. It wasn’t until later in the 1950s, in London, that Frame at last freed herself from the influence of society’s oppressive ‘you shoulds’, and learnt to be herself without apologising or feeling self-conscious.

Ibiza had been recommended to the young author on her first trip ‘overseas’ as a place where artists could live inexpensively and in relative freedom. She had inadvertently left her luggage and typewriter behind in Paris but with her usual independence, fatalistic air and sense of adventure she set out securing cheap lodgings and settling into a working routine. Conditions were good and distractions were few. For some months Frame struggled with the writing of Uncle Pylades, the second novel she had begun in Auckland. Her first novel Owls Do Cry was soon to be published in New Zealand, but Uncle Pylades wasn’t working out to her satisfaction and she eventually abandoned the attempt and concentrated on producing stories and poems.The stories she was happy with she sent to her trusted friend, the psychologist John Money in Baltimore, who was acting as a sounding board and an informal literary agent.
Ibicencan life was liberating for the industrious Frame, free at last from the stigma of her past and the judgmental curtain-twitching of New Zealand society. At first she avoided the lotus eating lifestyle of the bohemian expatriate community and enjoyed the company of the Spanish-speaking locals.Then early in 1957 as spring came to the Mediterranean, Frame engaged in a new form of liberation: her first profound romantic relationship.As she related in her autobiography An Angel at My Table, ‘I thought Bernard’s laughter was the most joyous I had ever heard.The sound seemed to have the right assembly to connect with a jagged shape inside my heart. I could not otherwise explain the delight of listening to his laughter.’

The springtime love affair was intense and pleasurable, full of delights and revelations for Frame, and self-deceptions, but she was brought to her senses when her American lover exclaimed,‘That would be terrible!’ at the prospect of her becoming pregnant. Disillusioned, she refused to see him again, and resumed her dedicated work schedule.
Some weeks later Frame left Ibiza to live in Andorra, where she miscarried the baby that had been conceived. She wrote to John Money with this news, also letting him know that she had more work to send him, but ‘I haven’t been able to bring myself to post it.’

By May 1957 Frame was back in London. She began to distance herself from the work she had written on Ibiza, belonging as it did to a time of her life she was keen to leave behind. In June she wrote to John Money using a rugby football metaphor: ‘I think somehow, in New Zealand language, that it was a curtain raiser, and the Shield match will happen quite soon . . .’ She was on the verge of major change. Her novel Owls Do Cry had now been published to considerable acclaim and she was determined to get reputable advice about her psychiatric label that had never been properly investigated back in New Zealand. British medical experts eventually discredited the original diagnosis and Frame would, by the end of the year, embark on a process of restoring her self-confidence and overcoming the trauma from the abuses she had suffered. In May 1958 she was to go as far as changing her name by deed poll (from Janet Paterson Frame to Nene Janet Paterson Clutha) to represent this breaking away from the troubles of her past.

Janet Frame Clutha (1958)
New Name, New Passport
 
Perhaps one of the last acts of Frame’s old life was to send a manuscript she called ‘The Mijo Tree’ to John Money in July 1957. It’s not surprising, then, that this five-thousand-word fable seems never to have been heard of again, remaining unpublished and unheralded in her lifetime. Later that month she took two hugely influential and positive steps: she engaged Patience Ross of A. M. Heath as a literary agent, and she sought the help of psychiatrists at the Maudsley Hospital, thus at last taking her personal and professional fate out of the hands of her friend John Money, who, being neither a qualified psychiatrist nor equipped to further her literary career, had over the years arguably done her more harm than good with his misguided attempts to ‘help’.
There are two surviving identical manuscripts of The Mijo Tree. The original typescript sent by Janet Frame to John Money in July 1957 is archived with his papers. Frame kept the carbon copy hidden away with her own papers in a trunk she lodged at the Hocken Library in 1970. Her copy bears the imprints of the corrections in her own hand that were written on the top copy. She bound her own copy between sheets of manila cardboard, with each page hole-punched and the lot tied up with twine, as was her custom when submitting a manuscript to a publisher. She typed the title (‘THE MIJO TREE’) and her name (BY JANET FRAME) in capital letters on the front cover.This special treatment, usually reserved for her novels, sets this manuscript apart from her other stories, despite its short length, suggesting that Frame conceived The Mijo Tree to be a standalone title.

In published titles such a short text is normally reserved for a children’s book, and the beautiful lucidity of the writing initially gives the reader the impression that The Mijo Tree is written for children. As the story unfolds however that impression is soon shattered.This grim tale is more like a scary fairy story for adults.The subject matter and setting of The Mijo Tree unmistakably belongs to Frame’s six-month sojourn in the Mediterranean region in 1956–1957 and the themes can be easily related to her own sexual awakening and disappointment experienced at that time. Perhaps Frame realised this transparency and kept the manuscript private for that reason. Most of the other work Frame left for posterity had been well signposted in her lifetime (‘the novel I wrote in France’,‘the goose bath poems’), sometimes with their names tantalisingly mentioned (Towards Another Summer,‘Gorse is Not People’,‘The Electric Blanket’).
She made no secret that she had deliberately reserved some of her manuscripts to be evaluated and published posthumously. The Mijo Tree is unique for the secrecy surrounding it: she never spoke publicly of it, and its name was unknown.

Is there such a thing as a ‘mijo tree’? If there is, it would seem to be a dialect name as the only appearance of the word ‘mijo’ in any botanical lists is as the Spanish name for a millet plant.The mijo tree as described in Frame’s story (having purple flowers and producing wood for ornaments and veneers) has the characteristics of Cercis siliquastrum, commonly known as the ‘Judas tree’ (for the belief that Judas Iscariot hanged himself on it) or the ‘love tree’ (for its heart-shaped leaves).This possible background to the nature of the fictional mijo tree seems to contain the rich levels of allusion that we associate with Janet Frame’s work. Also it appears to be no accident that the Spanish contraction mijo or mi’jo (pronounced mee-ho) is a very common slang term for male friend, male beloved, derived from mi hijo meaning ‘my son’. (The female equivalent is mija from mi hija, ‘my daughter’.)

For those readers who may feel that the The Mijo Tree’s message is unrelievedly tragic, may I recommend a repeated reading. Frame’s work always rewards subsequent visits and new depths and layers are revealed each time. The allegory is not limited to a simple exposition of selfishness and callous betrayal; there is also community and sacrifice, optimism and joy, faith and loyalty, and a tenderly and generously carried bloom that holds the seed of future possibility. Perhaps because Janet Frame triumphed over adversities that most of us couldn’t imagine, she was able to transform every experience, even the saddest, into an art that speaks far beyond the circumstances of its making.
Grateful acknowledgment is due to Deidre Copeland for her evocative, darkly sensual illustrations, to Katie Haworth for superb project management, to Catherine O’Loughlin,Tessa King, Sarah Healey and the rest of the team at Penguin New Zealand for making this dream a reality, and to the staff at the Hocken Collections, University of Otago, where The Mijo Tree has rested undisturbed for decades awaiting its moment.

 Pamela Gordon
Chair, Janet Frame Literary Trust
(from The Mijo Tree by Janet Frame, Penguin Books 2013)

 

Wednesday, December 6, 2017

Fan Girling




"Look, I'm an unusual actress. I'm six-foot-three, very pale, with whitish hair and I'm in Game of Thrones. Have you got a part for me?"

I was fascinated to read that Gwendoline Christie, probably best known as the magnificent Brienne of Tarth, has been a fan of Jane Campion ever since, at the age of 12, she watched An Angel at My Table, Campion's adaptation of Janet Frame's autobiography. Christie was hooked, and she subsequently watched everything else by the great director that she could find. After seeing and falling in love with Campion's first series of Top of the Lake, Christie finally wrote to Campion, who rewrote a part in the second series Top of the Lake: China Girl especially for her.


Gwendoline Christie as Miranda in Jane Campion's Top of the Lake: China Girl









 

The Janet Frame Memorial Address 2017



The Janet Frame Memorial Address is given annually by the current President of Honour of the New Zealand Society of Authors. The most recent lecture was delivered in Auckland by PEN stalwart Bernard Brown and you can listen online and learn everything you might want to know about the old guard of New Zealand Literature. Brown delivers a staccato supply of anecodotes, one liners and bon mots and a few mauvais mots thrown in, well-honed to evoke chuckles and giggles.

The caricature of Frame you hear in this speech is typical of the provincial NZ attitude towards her. She is (ironically) described as "small town surreal" despite being probably the most cosmopolitan of the prominent New Zealand writers, at home as she was in New York, London and San Francisco, where she set many of her novels. When someone describes Janet Frame as 'rural' or having a 'narrow focus' then you can be sure they are not at all familiar with the scope of her work as it has, for instance been commended by the American Academy of Arts and Letters. You hear Frame praised in this speech, sure, but you also hear the stories in her first collection described patronisingly as 'little gremlins' that were allegedly given masterful midwifery by Frank Sargeson. Not true actually - Sargeson came on board much later, while Frame was writing her second book, after she had already made her name with her first book, and Frame never allowed Sargeson anywhere near her actual writing. What she learned from Frank was about the discipline of the daily life of the writer.

Another fallacy I haven't heard before is the suggestion that personnel from P.E.N. contacted Seacliff Hospital in 1952 to let them know that one of their inmates had won a literary prize, thus being responsible for her escape from imminent brain surgery. In fact Frame's doctor at Seacliff read a report in the local newspaper just days before her lobotomy was scheduled. Nobody except fate intervened - not someone from P.E.N., not Frame's family, not even Janet Frame's friend John Money who by then was in the USA. The press release describes Janet Frame as an Auckland resident, evidence for the fact that P.E.N. officials did not even  know that Frame had returned to Dunedin and was back at Seacliff Hospital. Her writing, and the prize it attracted, did save her, so we can think of the judges as partly responsible for her reprieve. They recognized the worth of her writing. But they did not step in to save Frame as Bernard Brown claims in this speech. It might be interesting to try to track down where this story has came from. Or not. I have heard various versions of Frame's reprieve: one has John Money holding a scalpel over her head and then having a mystical illumination and deciding to let her be. Another has the surgeon (in some stories it is a woman doctor) holding the scalpel and John Money barges his way into the room and wrests the knife away.

New Zealand Herald, Friday 26 December 1952
Clipping kept by Janet Frame's cousin May Williamson
(With thanks to May Williamson's family)


Still, it's probably unfair to listen in to the after-dinner-speech genre after the fact and without the benefit of the lubrication provided on the night. In the cold light of day, the gossip and the dog whistles and the in-jokes don't sound quite as charming as they do when delivered to an admiring crowd of old friends and colleagues who know the drill, and know when to snigger and when to guffaw or gasp.

Many of Bernard Brown's anecdotes were amusing and I thought he made some valid points, especially about the opposition to Trump and about the responsibility of satire to target issues rather than personalities. I did agree with him when he railed against "the simperingly uncritical reviewing" to be found in the weekend papers. "It's a problem," he said, and I concur. Croneyism on the one hand and score-settling on the other are helping to destroy the confidence of the public in our literary institutions and awards. Good books are overlooked and bad books are lionised for the wrong reasons, nothing to do with the worth of the writing.

Here's a link to the recording and transcript (in preparation).


 

'The Electric Blanket' by Janet Frame: a lesson for palliative care


On Sundays she insisted on making the meal herself, though ‘taking things easy’, she would explain, smilingly and terribly aware. Peter too felt the terrible awareness, which he regarded as a kind of inner hearsay that rippled along the grapevine of his own deep and long love; until the doctor revealed his secret knowledge as truth.
‘When, doctor?’ he asked.
‘Anytime,’ said the doctor.
So that the days ahead now became like part of a dark fruit, with wind and flesh being torn apart each day in helpless foreboding search for the bitter seed of moment.

Anytime.

~ Janet Frame, from 'The Electric Blanket' in Between My Father and the King: New and Uncollected Stories, Counterpoint Press, Berkeley CA, USA (2012)



'The Electric Blanket' is a short story about an old man and his dying wife. In the Journal of Palliative Care (31 October 2015;31(3):193-5), in an essay entitled Janet Frame's "An Electric Blanket": Love, loss, and "the bitter seed of moment", Frank Brennan describes 'The Electric Blanket' as "rare poetry — exquisite phrasing that suffuses the air at every bedside. In a few short sentences, Frame crystallizes the dual response of patients and their families to the news of serious illness: the “first shock of knowing and the torture of wondering.”

This story acts as more evidence for Frame's deep knowledge of and compassion for the human condition, and her rare gift for expressing truths about it. Again, also, Frame's art has relevance for issues in the real world.

My own favourite line in the story is:

"a kind of inner hearsay that rippled along the grapevine of his own deep and long love"

Janet Frame never offered this story for publication in her lifetime, but carefully preserved it (and others) and left it for her executors to publish. (I had the privilege to co-edit this collection and the joy of observing the critical acclaim the stories attracted.) In case there was any doubt about why she had withheld it, she told the story of 'The Electric Blanket' in her autobiography. She had shown it to Frank Sargeson, who (in her eyes) had damned it with faint praise. I am pretty sure that she herself knew the story was good and that one day she would be vindicated. She didn't need this affirmation in her lifetime, but I do think she anticipated it. She always regarded the posthumous trajectory as an integral part of a significant writer's career, and had made plans to ensure that her posthumous career would be an interesting and eventful one.

 

Tuesday, December 5, 2017

A Bellbird Sang in Melbourne Street


Just in time for Christmas comes another of the themed literary anthologies that Penguin Random House New Zealand does so well. Bird Words: New Zealand Writers on Birds comes in a Vintage imprint, hardbound with a pretty cover and a golden ribbon.
The selection is fresh and interesting, covering a wide range of the best Kiwi poetry and fiction and non-fiction writers of past and present. There is also a useful section of author biographies at the back of the book. Janet Frame's bio includes her famous resolution that her poetic 'imagination' need not be imported from the other side of the world: "I refused to accept that if I were to fulfil my secret ambition to be a poet, I should spend my imaginative life among the nightingales instead of among the wax-eyes and the fantails."

There is a short story by Janet Frame in the collection, as well as an excerpt from the text of the eulogy Michael King delivered at her Memorial Service. The title of this blog post appears in that tribute. Melbourne Street is in South Dunedin where Janet Frame lived for a while when she returned to Dunedin in the late 1990s.



From the NZ Listener review (21 October 2017, p.51) by Linda Herrick:

Why do we love birds so? Perhaps we can turn to Michael King's Janet and the Birds, an extract from The Silence Beyond: Selected Writings compiled by his daughter Rachael King in 2011. King and Janet Frame, both mortally ill, are discussing the implications of a morepork staring through the window of a house King was visiting, a portent, they believe, of death.
But King had left the room. "The owl came looking for you. And you weren't there. That might mean you're reprieved," she tells him.
Sadly, both are no longer with us. But the inclusion of their writing - Frame's The Birds Began to Sing is also in this collection - is one of the many reasons Bird Words sings so directly to the heart.